|CALENDAR STATUS: Active|
|State of Oregon v. N. R. L.|
|Lewis & Clark Law School|
|Christa Obold-Eshleman on behalf of N. R. L.|
Cecil A. Reniche-Smith on behalf of State of Oregon
Statement of Issues:
|State of Oregon v. N. R. L. (S060355) (A144789) (appeal from Washington County Circuit Court; opinion reported at 249 Or App 321, 277 P3d 564 (2012)).|
Youth (N.R.L.) has been granted review of a Court of Appeals decision that affirmed a trial court judgment imposing restitution in the amount of $114, 071.13.
On review, the issue is:
Does the right to a jury trial in Article I, Section 17, of the Oregon Constitution, apply to a determination of the imposition of, and amount of, restitution in a juvenile delinquency case?
The foregoing summary of a Supreme Court case that is scheduled for oral argument has been prepared for the benefit of the public. Parties and practitioners should rely on neither the factual summary set out above, nor the statement of issues to be decided, as delineating the questions that the Supreme Court ultimately may consider on review. See generally Oregon Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.20.
Justice(s) NOT Participating: