|CALENDAR STATUS: Active|
|State of Oregon v. Harold Lee Campbell|
|Supreme Court Courtroom|
|Susan F. Drake on behalf of Harold Lee Campbell|
Rebecca Johansen on behalf of State of Oregon
Statement of Issues:
|State of Oregon v. Harold Lee Campbell (S060046) (A143237) (appeal from Union County Circuit Court; affirmed without opinion at 247 Or App 353 (2011)).|
Defendant Harold Lee Campbell seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision that affirmed without opinion his conviction for unlawful possession of methamphetamine.
On review, the issue is:
Do the former jeopardy protections of ORS 131.515 and Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution, bar a prosecution for possession of methamphetamine when the state previously prosecuted the defendant for driving under the influence of a controlled substance based on the same incident?
The foregoing summary of a Supreme Court case that is scheduled for oral argument has been prepared for the benefit of the public. Parties and practitioners should rely on neither the factual summary set out above, nor the statement of issues to be decided, as delineating the questions that the Supreme Court ultimately may consider on review. See generally Oregon Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.20.
Justice(s) NOT Participating: