|CALENDAR STATUS: Active|
|State of Oregon v. Deborah Ann Musser|
|Supreme Court Case 1|
|Erica Herb on behalf of Deborah Ann Musser|
Rolf Moan on behalf of State of Oregon
Statement of Issues:
|State of Oregon v. Deborah Ann Musser (S060868) (A145540) (appeal from Lane County Circuit Court; opinion reported at 253 Or App 178, 289 P3d 340 (2012)).|
The State of Oregon has been granted review of a Court of Appeals decision that reversed and remanded a trial court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence filed by defendant Deborah Ann Musser.
On review, the issue is:
If a defendant voluntarily consents to a search for purposes of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, and if the search reveals incriminating evidence, can unlawful police conduct that preceded the consent require suppression of the evidence?
The foregoing summary of a Supreme Court case that is scheduled for oral argument has been prepared for the benefit of the public. Parties and practitioners should rely on neither the factual summary set out above, nor the statement of issues to be decided, as delineating the questions that the Supreme Court ultimately may consider on review. See generally Oregon Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.20.
Justice(s) NOT Participating: