|CALENDAR STATUS: Active|
|Dwight G. Purdy v. Deere And Company|
|Supreme Court Case 2|
|Travis Eiva and Kathryn H. Clarke on behalf of Dwight G. Purdy|
Jeffrey S. Eden and Michael T. Garone on behalf of Ramsey-Waite Co, and Deere and Company
Statement of Issues:
|Dwight G. Purdy v. Deere And Company (S060993) (A144265) (appeal from Lane County Circuit Court; opinion reported at 252 Or App 635, 287 P3d 1281 (2012)).|
Plaintiff Dwight G. Purdy has been granted review of a Court of Appeals decision that affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant Deere and Company.
On review, the issue is:
Must an appellant demonstrate than an asserted instructional or evidentiary error was necessarily implicated in the jury's verdict in order to establish reversible error?
The foregoing summary of a Supreme Court case that is scheduled for oral argument has been prepared for the benefit of the public. Parties and practitioners should rely on neither the factual summary set out above, nor the statement of issues to be decided, as delineating the questions that the Supreme Court ultimately may consider on review. See generally Oregon Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.20.
Justice(s) NOT Participating: