|CALENDAR STATUS: Active|
|Department of Human Services v. A. R. S.|
|Supreme Court Case 2|
|George W. Kelly on behalf of S. D.-V.|
Cecil A. Reniche-Smith on behalf of Department of Human Services
Megan L. Jacquot on behalf of N. S.
Shannon Storey on behalf of A. R. S.
|*WILL NOT BE WEBCAST|
Statement of Issues:
|Department of Human Services v. A. R. S. (S061705) (A153447) (appeal from Washington County Circuit Court; opinion reported at 258 Or App 624, 310 P3d 1186 (2013)).|
In this juvenile dependency proceeding, S.D.-V. (father) has been granted review of a Court of Appeals decision that reversed and remanded a trial court's denial of motions by mother and child to dismiss the wardship, and the trial court's entry instead of a review hearing judgment that continued the permanency plan of reunification.
On review, the issue is:
With respect to a review hearing under ORS 419B.449(1), must the Department of Human Services prove that there is a continuing basis for jurisdiction, or is it the parent instead who must prove that the basis for jurisdiction no longer exists?
The foregoing summary of a Supreme Court case that is scheduled for oral argument has been prepared for the benefit of the public. Parties and practitioners should rely on neither the factual summary set out above, nor the statement of issues to be decided, as delineating the questions that the Supreme Court ultimately may consider on review. See generally Oregon Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.20.
Justice(s) NOT Participating: