|CALENDAR STATUS: Active|
|State of Oregon v. William Perez|
|Supreme Court Courtroom|
|Stephanie Hortsch on behalf of William Perez|
Doug M. Petrina on behalf of State of Oregon
Statement of Issues:
|State of Oregon v. William Perez (S060132) (A143108) (appeal from Washington County Circuit Court; opinion reported at 247 Or App 353, 271 P3d 154 (2011)).|
Defendant William Perez has been granted review of a Court of Appeals decision that affirmed without opinion his convictions for rape I and sexual abuse I.
On review, the issues are:
(1) May a prosecutor refresh a witness's memory by reading portions of a police report in the form of a question?
(2) May a police officer and a sexual assault nurse examiner testify as to the details of a complaint of sexual misconduct, or must their testimony be limited to the fact of the complaint alone?
The foregoing summary of a Supreme Court case that is scheduled for oral argument has been prepared for the benefit of the public. Parties and practitioners should rely on neither the factual summary set out above, nor the statement of issues to be decided, as delineating the questions that the Supreme Court ultimately may consider on review. See generally Oregon Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.20.
Justice(s) NOT Participating: