|CALENDAR STATUS: Active|
|Jennifer Ann Heikkila v. Shawn Dean Heikkila|
|Supreme Court Case 2|
|Jonah Morningstar on behalf of Shawn Dean Heikkila|
Adam J. Brittle on behalf of Jennifer Ann Heikkila
Statement of Issues:
|Jennifer Ann Heikkila v. Shawn Dean Heikkila (S061636) (A154447) (appeal from Clackamas County Circuit Court).|
Shawn Dean Heikkila has been granted review of a Court of Appeals decision that dismissed his appeal for lack of jurisdiction on the basis that he failed timely to serve the attorney of Jennifer Ann Heikkila with the notice of appeal.
On review, the issue is:
Does the Court of Appeals have jurisdiction over an appellant's appeal if he timely served the respondent with the notice of appeal by mail but did not serve respondent's attorney?
The foregoing summary of a Supreme Court case that is scheduled for oral argument has been prepared for the benefit of the public. Parties and practitioners should rely on neither the factual summary set out above, nor the statement of issues to be decided, as delineating the questions that the Supreme Court ultimately may consider on review. See generally Oregon Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.20.
Justice(s) NOT Participating: