Create New Comment

 

Comments to Proposed UTCR Rules
Previous Page


Hide details for Chapter 5Chapter 5
5.100 (04/15/2016) - I feel bad not having seen this before. Everyone worked hard on this and generally I like it a lot. There is one small change I suggest. Instruct the lawyers to NOT use the word "Proposed" or "propos...
Hide details for [<a href="/web/utcrweb.nsf/utcrcomments/B7032C41CDC28BED88257F9600741688?OpenDocument">5.100 (04/15/2016)</a>]5.100 (04/15/2016) - By changing the wording of UTCR 5.100(1)(c) from requiring mailing to requiring "service" but not specifying what constitutes "service", the implication is that mailing is no longer an acceptable met...
RE: 5.100 (04/29/2016) - This rule is critical and needed! A certificate of readiness has to be attached to the proposed orders with both signatures BEFORE the judge is legally allowed to sign the order. If there is not any ...
5.100 (04/20/2016) - The proposed revision to UTCR 5.100 that will require many forms of orders and judgments to be "served on" rather than "mailed to" each unrepresented party prior to submitting the judgment or order t...